LIFE OF BRIAN 1979

When a film is still funny 25 years after it’s made, and doesn’t feel particularly aged, even a quarter of a century later, then you know that you’ve struck gold. The famous Monty Python crew once again take a well-known subject and make a lot of fun of it. This time, the subject is religion, or, more specifically, Christianity. Everyone who knows at least a little about Christianity, which is pretty much anyone from the western world, will probably be able to laugh at something in this movie. Unless, of course, you are very Christian yourself, in that case you will probably feel that the film is blasphemous(I don’t personally think so, since it makes fun of the followers and the general stupidity of people and organizations back in 30-something A.D., rather than Jesus and his teachings). The plot is about as incoherent as the usual Monty Python team film, though it should be noted that, like Monty Python and the Holy Grail, it is an actual film, and not a series of sketches, like, for example, the Meaning of Life. It’s about as paced as they usually are, most of the scenes contain a lot of jokes, and then they move on to the next scene, after about five minutes of jokes and sight gags. This is, unfortunately, the problem with their films; if you don’t like the jokes, the film might seem extremely slow to you; of course, one could argue that Monty Python mainly make movies for the jokes sake, but they could do better on the pacing, for the sake of viewers who don’t like all those repeated jokes. That’s not to say that I don’t like them, I laugh at them most of the time, heck, I laughed so hard that I almost got stomach ache from it at one particular instant. But, I guess that a lot of people won’t like them for this way of making movies. Oh well. You can’t please everyone. The humor is great, it’s standard Python wacky, crazy humor, so every Python fan should enjoy it. People who don’t like Monty Python should give this a chance too, if they have at least a little humor, and they aren’t Christian extremists. Christian "believers" can probably laugh at it too, like I said, it’s not the religion itself, it’s more the brainwashed followers that the film makes fun of. All in all, a great film for fans of the Python crew, and people who have a sense of humor about religion(a dark sense of humor, that is). I recommend it to fans of Monty Python, people who enjoy dark humor and people who can laugh a little at the less intelligent parts of Christianity. I fall into all three categories, and I loved it. 8/10

MEANING OF LIFE

According to Terry Gilliam, before the Pythons decided to make a sketch movie about the meaning of life, two ideas were considered for the movie. The first one was "Monty Python’s World War III", where they would all be soldiers wearing military uniforms full of advertisements, and the Armies would be sponsored. Another idea that was under consideration was a trial movie, where the Pythons are judged to be making not a movie, but a tax dodge. They spend the entire movie trying to prove they’re making a proper movie, trying to make an adaptation of "Hamlet" in the Caribbean. At the end, they’re found guilty and sentenced to execution, and each one of them gets to decide how they’re going to die. This idea was used in "The Meaning of Life" in the death sketch, where Arthur Jarrett (Graham Chapman) has chosen to die while pursued by naked girls.

A Clockwork Orange (1971)

A disturbing but yet very beautiful piece of film-making, Kubrick has created the ultimate study of mind manipulation in this film. It is a protest against reform programs that take away freedom of a choice, and the message of the film in terms of paying for one’s sins in all eternity is inescapable, evident to a large extent in the sardonic nature of the tale. Although set in the future, it hardly feels like it is, this being because the message of the film is overwhelmingly powerful and capable of applying to any age. The film has a number of possible hidden meanings to it a feat equaled on scale only by Kubrick’s former film ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’. Besides for the meaning behind the film, there are still the marks of a masterpiece. Kubrick’s direction is superb alongside the good photography, capturing shadows and angles needed to establish tone. The editing is excellent too, done in a flashy, brainwashing style at times to have relevance to the film. The choice of cast is again inspirational, however the film achieves the most in terms of music. Kubrick manages to use one of the earliest forms of art, classical music, and give it an unforgettable style and importance in the film. It is truly a difficult task to explain what is so great about a film such as ‘A Clockwork Orange’ it is maybe best explained by watching the film itself.